Journal Home
Search for

Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 57-62 (March 2010)


View previous. 4 of 12 View next.

Bilateral nasal obstruction due to an intranasal craniopharyngioma

Brian P. DunhamacCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Luv R. Javiaac, Larissa T. Bilaniukbc, Karen B. Zurac

Received 21 August 2008; received in revised form 2 February 2009; accepted 7 February 2009. published online 19 March 2009.

Summary 

A 14-year-old girl presented with a purely infrasellar adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Histologically benign, craniopharyngiomas occur predominantly extraaxially in the sellar and suprasellar regions; uniquely infrasellar craniopharyngiomas are extremely unusual. We discuss the embryology and treatment of this rare tumor.

Article Outline

Summary

1. Introduction

2. Case presentation

3. Discussion

4. Conclusion

References

Copyright

1. Introduction 

return to Article Outline

Craniopharyngiomas, while histologically benign, can be locally aggressive tumors. They are derived from the obliterated craniopharyngeal duct, Rathke's pouch (Fig. 1A and B). While some arise within the sella, most are found in the suprasellar region; a purely infrasellar craniopharyngioma is rare.


View full-size image.

Fig. 1. Sagittal view of an embryo showing Rathke's pouch in green, an epithelial diverticulum that arises during the fourth week of gestation from the oral stomodeum and invaginates superiorly towards the brain while diencephalic neuroectoderm descends. Cooperatively the two will form the pituitary gland. Inset B: Rathke's pouch eventually forms the anterior lobe and pars intermedia of the pituitary gland (shown in green). Incomplete resolution of the craniopharyngeal duct can result in cellular rests, which can give rise to purely infrasellar craniopharyngiomas. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of the article.)


2. Case presentation 

return to Article Outline

A 14-year-old girl presented to our institution with a 1-year history of bilateral nasal obstruction, headaches, and syncopal episodes related to noseblowing. Physical examination during the initial office visit revealed a mass in the posterior aspect of her nasal cavities (Fig. 2A). A CT scan showed calcifications within the mass. A magnetic resonance imaging study confirmed the presence of an obstructing mass with extension into both the nasopharynx and posterior nasal cavities (Fig. 2B). Neither study demonstrated intracranial involvement. Intraoperative nasal endoscopy revealed a tan polypoid mass that was completely obstructing both nasal cavities. Gentle manipulation showed that it was soft and that it was pedunculated on the posterior septum. Being relatively avascular, the tumor was easily removed under endoscopic visualization using Blakesley and TruCut forceps. It measured 2.8cm in its greatest dimension. Histologic examination led to the diagnosis of an infrasellar adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (Fig. 3). A 6-month postoperative surveillance MRI did not reveal tumor recurrence.


View full-size image.

Fig. 2. (A) Endoscopic view prior to excision of the right nasal cavity. (B) Coronal T1-weighted MRI.



View full-size image.

Fig. 3. Hematoxylin and Eosin slide, 20×: the tumor is composed of broad strands of squamous epithelium with peripheral palisading of the nuclei resting on a basement membrane, giving it a cyst like configuration. The “cysts” appear to be filled with an amorphous, eosinophilic, acellular material. There is abundant compact “wet keratin” and some areas that appear to be calcified. These features are consistent with an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma.


3. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Craniopharyngiomas are benign-appearing dysodontogenic epithelial tumors; over 96% of them affect intradural suprasellar anatomy. To our knowledge, there are over 40 reported cases of craniopharyngiomas with infrasellar involvement in the world literature; most of these had a sellar component. In contrast, there have only been eleven purely infrasellar, extracranial craniopharyngiomas reported in the literature (Table 1) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Table 1.

Purely infrasellar, extracranial craniopharyngiomas at the time of presentation.

Author/year
Age/sex
Symptoms
Location
Histology
Surgery
Radiation
Follow-up
Outcome
Pheline/1981*12 years/FHeadache, CN VI palsy, nasal obstructionSS, NP, RP, IF NP, RP, IF+ calcifications cystic/solid+calcificationsSublabial transnasal (incomplete) then DNone63 months*Persistence, reoperated @ 54 mos.
Lewin/198427 years/FEpistaxis, headacheNC (vomer), NPCystic/solid? calcificationsTPNone24 monthsNED
Ortiz/198820 years/MEpistaxis, nasal obstructionNPXA+calcificationsYesNoneNED
Pharaboz/198927 years/FHyponasality/nasal obstructionSS, NPX, NC, CCystic/solid+calcificationsTransnasal
Byrne/199029 years/FNasal obstructionNC, NPX, ES, SS, MS, CA+calcificationsLRAdjuvant36 monthsNED
Gili/19919 years/MNasal obstruction, diplopiaNPX, SS, PA, CFisch type CNone6 yearsNED
Bret/199316 years/FNasal obstructionSS, NPX, NC, PPF, IFCystic/solid+calcificationsLeFort I MaxillectomyNone14 monthsNED
Cheddadi/19961mo/FNeonatal respiratory distressNC, NPEndoNone31 monthsNED
Jiang/19987 years/MEpistaxisESCystic/solid+calcificationsEndoNone12 monthsNED
Deutsch/20018 years/MHeadache, visual lossES, SSA+calcificationsBFCAdjuvant13 monthsAWD
Ahsan/200459 years/MEpistaxisNC, NPX, ES, SS, MSPcalcificationsDNone12 monthsNED
This report14 years/FNasal obstruction, headaches, syncopeNC, NPXA+calcificationsEndoNoneNED

Location: C-clivus; ES-ethmoid sinus; IF-infratemporal fossa; JF-jugular foramen; MS-maxillary sinus; NC-nasal cavity; NP-nasopharynx; SS-sphenoid sinus; PA-petrous apex; PPF-pterygopalatine fossa. Histology: A-adamantinomatous; P-papillary. Surgery: BFC-bifrontal craniotomy with subfrontal transbasal approach; D-sublabial Denker's medial maxillectomy and sphenoethmoidectomy; Endo-transnasal endoscopic; LR-lateral rhinotomy; TP-transpalatal; TPC-temporoparietal craniotomy. Outcome: AWD-Alive with disease; NED-No evidence of disease

*

Pt was reoperated 54 months after an initial incomplete resection.

The overall incidence of craniopharyngiomas is approximately 0.13 per 100,000 person years and is not gender or race dependent. Craniopharyngiomas comprise approximately 1.5% to 11.6% of all intracranial tumors. A bimodal distribution places peak incidence rates in children (aged 5–14 years) and adults (aged 50–74 years). Approximately 338 cases of this disease occur annually in the United States, with 96 occurring in children from 0 to 14 years of age [12].

Craniopharyngiomas are thought to arise from the remnants of Rathke's pouch (Fig. 1). By the twelfth week of gestation, the craniopharyngeal duct, the cellular tract formed by the dorsal ascension of Rathke's pouch disappears, leaving an obliterated tract between the sphenoid cavity to the junction of the palate and posterior nasal septum [13]. Most craniopharyngiomas, however, occur in and/or above the sella turcica. Only occasionally do they develop in the basisphenoid or pharynx, presumably from rests of cells in an incompletely obliterated tract.

In 1904, Erdheim was the first to theorize that craniopharyngiomas arise from epithelial cell rests in partially involuted hypophyseal-pharyngeal ducts [14]. In 1931, Carmichael subsequently demonstrated epithelial remnants of the duct in the region of the pituitary gland in 33% of autopsies [15]. The histologic pattern of craniopharyngiomas is variable but recapitulates the enamel organ of the tooth, which explains their histologic similarity to ameloblastomas, tumors of the enamel organ cells [16], [17]. There are two predominant histologic types: adamantinomatous and papillary [18]. The adamantinomatous tumor classically appears as a cystic tumor with a solid component; ascribed as the pediatric variant, these typically occur in children but can occur in early adulthood. Calcifications are often noted on CT imaging. This subtype tends to be poorly encapsulated, with a propensity for inflammation and fibrosis, often leading to dense interdigitation of the surrounding tissues and vasculature. This increases the risks of recurrence, regardless of treatment modality. By contrast the adult type, the papillary variant, is typically a solid tumor without calcification; having greater encapsulation, this variant lends itself more readily to surgical excision. The predilection of these two variants for their respective age groups helps to explain the tumor's bimodal distribution.

The differential diagnosis of an infrasellar mass includes squamous cell carcinomas, nasopharyngeal carcinomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, esthesioneuroblastomas, inverting papillomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, lymphomas, sarcoidosis, eosinophilic granulomas, tuberculosis, syphilis, juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas, chordomas, Rathke cleft cysts, teratomas, dermoids, choristomas and encephaloceles.

Craniopharyngiomas’ symptomatology results from local expansion and impingement on surrounding structures; metastases from craniopharyngiomas are extremely rare. In the case of a purely infrasellar mass, nasal obstruction, epistaxis, sinusitis and headaches predominate. If there is a suprasellar/intracranial component, then visual field defects, varying degrees of pituitary insufficiency, and signs of increasing intracranial pressure may appear.

The work up should include general and neurologic examination (including visual field evaluation), a thorough nasal endoscopy, and both MRI/MRA and CT imaging, with and without contrast. CT imaging will often detect the calcifications found in the adamantinomatous variant as well as bony destruction and remodeling. MRI imaging best delineates soft tissue involvement and is particularly important to preoperative planning. If intracranial involvement is noted, an endocrine workup is indicated.

To date, there is no true consensus regarding the optimal treatment of craniopharyngiomas. In the case of uniquely infrasellar tumors, only case reports exist. It is therefore impossible to have true evidence-based recommendations regarding treatment and prognosis. From the gathered case reports of infrasellar tumors, the primary treatment has historically been complete surgical excision with or without postoperative radiation depending on the extent of the tumor. Needless to say, close postoperative surveillance is warranted for these rare tumors; it should include postoperative MRI surveillance at regulated intervals (3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). The surgical approach to an infrasellar craniopharyngioma is dictated by its location and extent. Lateral rhinotomy or endoscopic approaches can be used for tumors restricted to the confined to the nasopharynx and nasal cavity. For larger tumors, transphenoidal and transcranial trajectories may be necessary.

For intracranial tumors, though still controversial, radical excision is still considered the treatment of choice if the tumor's size and involvement with the surrounding tissue permits it [19]. If not, then subtotal resection is usually accompanied by radiation therapy; without radiation, recurrence rates may be as high as 73% and is likely to occur regardless of tumor variant [20], [21]. Some authors have reported success in treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas with intracystic chemotherapeutic therapy with as bleomycin as well as intracavitary radiotherapy [22], [23], [24].

The 5-year survival rate for all craniopharyngiomas is approximately 80% and decreases with older age at the time of diagnosis [12]. Data collected for the National Cancer Data Base in the United States from 1985–1988 and from 1990–1992 revealed that the survival rate varied by age: patients younger than 20 years had a 99% survival rate at 5 years, while only 38% of those over 65 survived [12]. Tumor size may also influence survival rates. In one pediatric series, the size of tumor at the time of presentation correlated with risk of recurrence, five of six patients with tumors ≥5cm experienced recurrences while only 6 of 30 recurred when the tumor was ≤5cm [25]. Subtotal resection without radiation therapy is often associated with elevated recurrence as well.

4. Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

This case highlights an unusual cause of nasal obstruction. While purely infrasellar craniopharyngiomas are unusual, they should remain in the differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal and nasal masses. A careful work up is critical to evaluate for intracranial involvement as is an endocrine work-up if intracranial involvement is suspected or confirmed.

Radical excision is the treatment of choice for an infrasellar craniopharyngioma. Consideration should be given to postoperative radiation, especially if the tumor is incompletely removed. Due to the likelihood of local recurrence (especially the adamantinomatous variant) close postoperative follow-up is warranted.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1]Pheline C, Jamois Y, Engel P, Leguyarder B, Penot JC. One case of atypical craniopharyngioma located in sphenoidal body and operated first by nasal then by maxillary sinus route (author's transl). Neurochirurgie. 1981;27(4):221–224. MEDLINE

[2]. [2]Lewin R, Ruffolo E, Saraceno C. Craniopharyngioma arising in the pharyngeal hypophysis. South Med. J. 1984;77(December (12)):1519–1523. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[3]. [3]Ortiz RM, Sola JJM, Martinez FA, Garcia JA, Prado JH. Craneofaringioma de cavum: aportacion de un caso. Acta Otorrinolaring Esp. 1988;39:119–121.

[4]. [4]Pharaboz C, Merran S, Cordoliani Y, Rizzoli P. Rhinopharyngeal craniopharyngioma. CT X-ray and MRI aspects. J. Radiol. 1989;70(October (10)):573–575. MEDLINE

[5]. [5]Byrne MN, Sessions DG. Nasopharyngeal craniopharyngioma. Case report and literature review. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1990;99(August (8)):633–639. MEDLINE

[6]. [6]Bernat Gili A, Garcia Garcia B. Craniopharyngioma of the nasopharynx. Apropos of a case. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1991;42(July–August (4)):269–272. MEDLINE

[7]. [7]Bret P, Beziat JL. Sphenoido-nasopharyngeal craniopharyngioma. A case with radical excision by Le Fort I-type maxillotomy. Neurochirurgie. 1993;39(4):235–240. MEDLINE

[8]. [8]Cheddadi D, Triki S, Gallet S, et al. Neonatal rhinopharyngeal obstruction due to craniopharyngioma. Arch. Pediatr. 1996;3(April (4)):348–351.

[9]. [9]Jiang RS, Wu CY, Jan YJ, Hsu CY. Primary ethmoid sinus craniopharyngioma: a case report. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1998;112(April (4)):403–405. MEDLINE

[10]. [10]Deutsch H, Kothbauer K, Persky M, Epstein FJ, Jallo GI. Infrasellar craniopharyngiomas: case report and review of the literature. Skull Base. 2001;11(May (2)):121–128.

[11]. [11]Ahsan F, Rashid H, Chapman A, Ah-See KW. Infrasellar craniopharyngioma presenting as epistaxis, excised via Denker's medial maxillectomy approach. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2004;118(November (11)):895–898. MEDLINE

[12]. [12]Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J. Neurosurg. 1998 Oct;89(4):547–551. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[13]. [13]Moore KL. The Developing Human – Clinically Oriented Embryology. W.B. Saunders Company; 1988;.

[14]. [14]Erdheim J. Ueber hypophysengangsgeschwulste und hirncholesteatome. Akad. Wiss. Wien. 1904;113:537–726.

[15]. [15]Carmichael HT. Squamous epithelial rests in the hypophysis cerebri. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry. 1931;26:966–975.

[16]. [16]DeLellis RA. The endocrine system. In:  Cotran RS,  Kumar V,  Robbins SL editor. Robbins’ Pathologic Basis of Disease. 4th ed.. W.B. Saunders Company; 1989;p. 1213.

[17]. [17]Badger KV, Gardner DG. The relationship of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma to ghost cell ameloblastoma of the jaws: a histopathologic and immunohistochemical study. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1997;26(September (8)):349–355. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[18]. [18]Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS. Region of the sella turcica. Surgical pathology of the nervous system and its covering. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2002;pp. 475–483.

[19]. [19]Savas A, Erdem A, Tun K, Kanpolat Y. Fatal toxic effect of bleomycin on brain tissue after intracystic chemotherapy for a craniopharyngioma: case report. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(1):213–216Discussion 216–217.

[20]. [20]Sanford RA, Muhlbauer MS. Craniopharyngioma in children. Neurol. Clin. 1991;9(May (2)):453–465. MEDLINE

[21]. [21]Weiner HL, Wisoff JH, Rosenberg ME, et al. Craniopharyngiomas: a clinicopathological analysis of factors predictive of recurrence and functional outcome. Neurosurgery. 1994;35(December (6)):1001–1010Discussion 1010–1001. CrossRef

[22]. [22]Hasegawa T, Kondziolka D, Hadjipanayis CG, Lunsford LD. Management of cystic craniopharyngiomas with phosphorus-32 intracavitary irradiation. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(April (4)):813–820Discussion 820–812.

[23]. [23]Broggi G, Franzini A. Bleomycin for cystic craniopharyngioma. J. Neurosurg. 1996;84(June (6)):1080–1081. MEDLINE

[24]. [24]Cavalheiro S, Sparapani FV, Franco JO, da Silva MC, Braga FM. Use of bleomycin in intratumoral chemotherapy for cystic craniopharyngioma. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 1996;84(January (1)):124–126. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[25]. [25]Hetelekidis S, Barnes PD, Tao ML, et al. 20-year experience in childhood craniopharyngioma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1993;27(September (2)):189–195. Full-Text PDF (104 KB) | CrossRef

a Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States

b Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States

c Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Division of Otolaryngology, 1st Floor, Wood Building, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. Tel.: +1 215 590 3440; fax: +1 215 590 3986.

PII: S1871-4048(09)00015-X

doi:10.1016/j.pedex.2009.02.001


View previous. 4 of 12 View next.